passkey
Registered user
Registered: 04-2004
Posts: 3
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
J H Allen knew a thing or two
DERMATOLOGY AND HOMOEOPATHY
Always remember that it is the PATIENT you treat - not the symptom picture.... Prof J. T. Kent.
Quotes from - 'DISEASES AND THERAPEUTICS OF THE SKIN' by Prof J. H. Allen .......
"Eczema is always of constitutional origin, and the patient, as well as the
physician, should be well pleased to know that the life force has divorced it from within and thrown it out as an eruption upon the skin. We have the worst forms to deal with in the hereditary tubercular or syphilitic child , especially during the teething period.. No man can tell how many of these little lives are saved , by the disease coming to the surface, preserving the vital organs , especially the brain, from the ravages of the destructive miasm; therefore , ALL OINTMENTS AND MEDICAMENTS OF EVERY NAME AND DESCRIPTION ARE TO BE DISCARDED IN TOTO; depending alone on the anti-miasmatic treatment or the removal of the miasm which ALONE is the pre-disposing cause, using by prefernce the higher potencies. .... and while bathing is not to be neglected too much bathing is as a rule harmful as all diseases of the skin are rebellious to water. "
"Erysipelas ... such local disturbances as surgical operations and other wounds, parturition, vaccination, etc often readily assist in the development of the disease, and yet we have idiopathic cases developing with greater frequency where there is no lesion to assist in the development of the streptococci. THE SIMPLE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THE TRUE CAUSE OF THE DISEASE EXISTS WITHIN THE INDIVIDUAL, AND ALL EXCITING CAUSES SIMPLY ASSIST IN THE DEVELOPING OR PROPAGATION OF THAT INTERNAL AND EVER PRESENT CONDITION."
"Symtomatology is by no means confined to the skin itself but may involve any part or organ of the body. The true homoeopath recognizes all disease whether upon the skin or not , as first a disturbance of the life force or the internal dynamis, and that the symptoms that manifest themselves upon the skin are simply a reflection or external expression of the internal change; and that the internal economy is usually relieved by such an expression."
QUOTES FROM
' DISEASES OF THE SKIN - Their constitutional nature and cure. '
J.COMPTON BURNETT.
1 That the skin is an important living organ of the body
2 It stands in intimate but poorly understood realtionship to all internal organs and parts.
3 Its health is conditioned by general health - ie a healthy skin on an unhealthy body is inconcievable.
4 That generally its diseases come from within. sometimes even when initially they impinge on it from without.
5 That being biologically part of the body, being fed from within, having its life from within, having its health from within, and having its disease from within. it must also be treated medicinally from within.
6 That skin diseases are most commonly not merely organic, but at the same time organismic, or constitutional.
7 That the skin being an excreatory organ, and being spread out all over the body, is often made use of by nature to keep the internal organs free from disease.
8 That as each portion of the skin corresponds vitally with some internal organ or part, so the skin disease is often merely the outward expression of internal disease.
9 The external treatment of Diseases of the Skin with lotions, ointments or whatsoever else is demonstably shallow in conception, wrong in theory, harmful in practice and therefore inadvisable
|
|
6/28/2004, 4:07 pm
|
Link to post
Email passkey
PM passkey
|
Firlefanz
A Posting Machine
Registered: 05-2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 6029
Karma: 346 (+388/-42)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: J H Allen knew a thing or two
Hm. Interesting.
I know we are using skins here.... but I think you are not talking abou them. 
--- - Firlefanz
Reading: "The Pendragon Banner", by Sylvian Hamilton
Writing: "Evelina Unicorn Girl" - for lack of a better title
My home - Schreiberlinge unter sich |
|
6/28/2004, 4:10 pm
|
Link to post
Email Firlefanz
PM Firlefanz
Blog
|
Smackdown5
Mr RunSearch
Runboard user emeritus
Registered: 07-2003
Location: UK
Posts: 8201
Karma: 259 (+412/-153)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: J H Allen knew a thing or two
Seeing as you enjoy posting articles I thought I would post one for you
Credit http://www.spammingbureau.com/definition-of-spam.php
Definition of Spam
Spam is defined as unsolicited bulk e-mail sent to large numbers of people to promote products or services. Spam also refers to inappropriate and off-topic promotional or commercial postings to discussion groups, bulletin boards, or weblogging sites often referred to as "blogs".
But how many posts does it take to be considered spam? There is no predefined "magic number", but many argue 20 is a good rule of thumb. Others have a more specific guideline, saying 5 or more posts with identical content within a two-week period. Some even follow what is known as the Breidbart Index. The Breidbart Index is the sum of the square roots of the number of newsgroups. For example, if 10 articles are posted to 4 newsgroups, then a BI of 20 would result. 20 is the number which most cancelbots are programmed to recognize.
Perhaps more important than the frequency of messages is the relevance to the recipient. Most spam is not targeted toward any market since marketing statistics cannot be gleaned from a list of email addresses. Thus a mass emailing has very little relevance to some of those email addresses. If you are a man and you have received spam about breast enlargements, you know how this applies.
Finally, spam promises a great benefit to a recipient for very little effort or contribution. In other words, if it sounds to good to be true, it probably is.
As for the term "spam" itself, theories abound. Some suggest it is a reference to a Monty Python song, others say it shows how most people feel about the canned meat of the same name: nobody really wants it and it usually gets pushed aside in favor of something else more tempting.
For more information on spam, check out these links:
Spamhaus is an organization dedicated to eliminating spam.
The Net Abuse FAQ has a detailed definition of spam and discussion on how spam is determined.
Mail Abuse Prevention System maintains a list of known spammers as well as providing discussion on spam itself.
|
|
6/28/2004, 6:03 pm
|
Link to post
PM Smackdown5
Blog
|
